Details, Fiction and fishing expedition case law
Details, Fiction and fishing expedition case law
Blog Article
If your employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a chance to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only finished if the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence as well as petitioner company responded to the allegations therefore they were nicely mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Modest fees use.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to the offender as well as the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
Sign up for E-mail Notification of new opinions The cases listed below have had opinions filed for them within the last fourteen times. The following information is obtainable for Just about every case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, including signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), clearly distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion requires a transfer to the higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, around the other hand, provides financial relief by positioning an employee in a very higher pay back scale, without transforming their position duties or position. It is a mechanism designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained in the same pay scale for a lengthy time, particularly when they absence alternatives for promotion. Upgradation is often a policy Software used to reduce the hardship of very long-term stagnation. Read more
Given that the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become attained, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice from the Peace u/s 22-A is just not obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing towards the accused party; nor obliged to essentially or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to contemplate all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are several of the relevant factors. Read more
In case you find an error within the content of a published opinion (like a misspelled name or perhaps a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
The justices must be balanced between the political parties, these that neither party has an advantage of more than one particular seat. To qualify to serve on the Supreme Court, a candidate must have been admitted to practice law in New Jersey for at least ten years. This will be the same requirement as for Superior Court judges.
twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons having their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are to get inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service is the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude here but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to accomplish absent with the candidature on the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair to your offender plus the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nevertheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a lot of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere into a tradition that the reader should be able to deduce the logic from the decision along with the statutes.[four]
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Criminal cases Within the common legislation tradition, courts decide the regulation applicable to some case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Contrary to most civil law systems, common regulation systems Stick to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their have previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all reduced courts should make decisions reliable with the previous decisions of higher courts.